3
It is a typically rigid attitude which
the War Office have taken up, but we can afford to
put in a retort. There is no great hurry and we
have in fact a pretty good case here.
I would say now to the War Office that
in H.K.
the Secretary of State is aware of the extension
recently agreed upon in the list of revenue classes
which are exempted or partially exempted from
assessment for Defence Contribution, but that he
would not be prepared to agree that the review
then carried out must be accepted necessarily as
rendering a full consideration of the present
question an impracticable or undesirable course
In the memorandum submitted by the
War Office in 1931 which contained a statement of
the principle followed with regard to Defence
Contribution in Hong Kong it was stated that the
system of a contribution limited to a percentage
of revenue was designed to produce roughly a fair
contribution in view not only of the cost of the
garrison but also of the general financial capacity
of the Colony; since the present application
relates to the exemption of revenue in respect of
an annual expense which Hong Kong is called upon
to bear as its share in a project deemed to be in
the interest of the Empire generally (including
of course Hong Kong) it would appear that the
Colony has a reasonable case for claiming not only
that the local financial capacity is proportionately
limited, but especially that her contribution towards
this Empire service should not be made more onerous
by itself being increased by 20% owing to the
liability
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.